From: Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach
Broad components | Specific details |
---|---|
Context | Acute care hospital (The Ottawa Hospital) TQH |
Problem | Overcrowding in the emergency room |
Knowledge users | Senior hospital management |
Question of interest | What is the safety and effectiveness of short stay units in the emergency department? |
Evidence summary process | • The principal knowledge user was integrally involved in Steps 1 through 3 (Needs assessment; Question development and refinement; Proposal development and approval) • A clinical expert provided key conceptual feedback during Steps 1 and 2 and contributed to the writing of the proposal (Step 3) • The information scientist developed and executed the search strategy (Step 4) • The clinical expert also served as the reviewer for Step 5, along with the research coordinator • Steps 6-7 were completed by the research coordinator; the final report was edited and approved by the principal knowledge user and clinical experta • The principal knowledge user distributed the evidence summary (Figure 1) to TOH senior hospital management and the wider clinical team; follow-up with knowledge users (Step 8) is ongoing. |
Outputs | • Positive response to the evidence summary among both the clinical and senior management teams; the evidence summary is being used to inform discussions considering the implementation of a short stay unit • Development of a positive collaborative relationship between the research team and knowledge users has led to the decision to pursue a collaborative knowledge synthesis opportunity on this topic. |