The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Wichor Bramer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kath Wright|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Wichor Bramer|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|13 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|13 Dec 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-2-115|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.