Table 2 Thomas C Chalmers awards for statistical issues related to systematic reviews
From: Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
Year | Authors | Title |
|---|---|---|
1996 | Liberati A, D’Amico R, Torri V, Tinazzi A, Leonetti C, Pifferi S | Meta-analyses from different sources of information |
1998 | Deeks J, Bradburn M, Bilker W, Localio R, Berlin J | Much ado about nothing: statistical methods for meta-analysis with rare events |
1999 | Higgins J | How should we interpret updated meta-analyses? |
2001 | Deeks JJ | Half dead or half alive? Which way should events be coded for meta-analyses of risk ratios? |
2003 | Hollis S and Preston C | Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in a binary meta-analysis. Better than best/worst case analysis? |
2005 | Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C | Trial sequential analyses of six Cochrane neonatal group meta-analyses considering adequacy of allocation concealment |
Salanti G, Higgins J, Marinho V | How to determine the best treatment: a mixed-treatment-comparisons meta-analysis (MTM) of trials of topical fluoride therapies for the prevention of dental caries | |
2006 | Skipka G | The inclusion of the estimated inter-study variation into forest plots for random-effects meta-analyses - a suggestion for a graphical presentation |
2007 | Friedrich J, Adhikari N, Ohlsson A, Beyene J | Ratio of means as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in a meta-analysis: a simulation study |
Patsopoulos N, Ioannidis J, Evangelou E | Uncertainty of heterogeneity in meta-analysis | |
2008 | Anzures-Cabrera J, Higgins JPT | Expressing meta-analyses of continuous outcomes in terms of risks |