Table 2 Comparative effectiveness reviews assessed a
From: Assessment of a method to detect signals for updating systematic reviews
CER | 2009 prediction | Update commissioned by AHRQ |
|---|---|---|
Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease[11] | High | Yes |
Effectiveness of Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for Breast Abnormalities[12] | High | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Epoetin and Darbepoetin for Managing Anemia in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment[13] | High | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Analgesics for Osteoarthritis[14] | High | Yes |
Efficacy and Comparative Effectiveness of Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotics[15] | Medium | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Drug Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults[16] | Medium | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in Men and Women with Low Bone Density or Osteoporosis[17] | Medium | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Pharmacologic Treatment of Adult Depression[18] | Low | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists (ARBs) for Treating Essential Hypertension[19] | Low | Yes |
Comparative Effectiveness of Therapies for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer b[20] | Medium | No |
Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Artery Disease c[21] | Low | No |