Meta-analysis | Published data | Distributional estimates for low birthweight | Â | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Number of studies (sample size) | Mean difference (g) (95% CI) | P-value | Number of studies (sample size) | RR (95% CI) | P-value | Number of studies (sample size) | Distributional RR (95% CI) | P-value | Comments |
Bupassiri 2011 [34] | 21 (8,319) | 65 (16, 114) | 0.01 | 5 (13,638) | 0.83 (0.63, 1.09) | 0.18 | 21 (8,319) | 0.72 (0.58, 0.89) | < 0.01 | Â |
Crowther 2010 [35] | 4 (417) | 75 (−17, 167) | 0.11 | 7 (1,452) | 0.84 (0.68, 1.04) | 0.12 | 4 (417) | 0.99 (0.88, 1.06) | 0.42 |  |
Dodd 2010 [36] | 2 (282) | −75 (−210, 61) | 0.28 | 1 (49) | 0.41 (0.04, 4.20) | 0.45 | 2 (282) | 1.33 (0.78, 2.26) | 0.29 | 2/3 primary studies of mean birthweight outcome accessed |
Gouin 2011 [37] | 18 (6,855) | −441 (−532, −350) | < 0.01 | 19 (38,796) | 2.86 (2.36, 3.48) | < 0.01 | 18 (6,855) | 2.76 (2.12, 3.45) | 0.01 |  |
Gülmezoglu 2011 [38] | 1 (208) | −100 (−240, 40) | 0.16 | 1 (604) | 1.38 (0.92, 2.06) | 0.12 | 1 (208) | 1.40 (0.87, 2.24) | 0.16 |  |
Kawai 2011 [39] | 13 (35,015) | 45 (28, 62) | < 0.01 | 13 (35,015) | 0.92 (0.83, 1.02) | 0.09 | 13 (35,015) | 0.82 (0.75, 0.91) | < 0.01 | 13/15 primary studies accessed |
Kenyon 2010 [40] | 13 (6,480) | 49 (14, 85) | 0.01 | 2 (4,876) | 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) | 0.94 | 13 (6,480) | 0.99 (0.99, 1.00) | 0.53 | Â |
Ladhani 2011 [41] | 4 (880) | −279 (−485, −74) | 0.01 | 2 (26,026) | 3.28 (2.25, 4.78) | < 0.01 | 4 (880) | 2.41 (1.42, 4.09) | < 0.01 |  |
Lamont 2011 [42] | 1 (485) | −12 (−128, 104) | 0.89 | 2 (876) | 0.96 (0.62, 1.47) | 0.83 | 1 (485) | 1.03 (0.77, 1.38) | 0.84 |  |
Mathanga 2011 [43] | 2 (640) | 121 (27, 214) | 0.01 | 2 (624) | 0.80 (0.54, 1.18) | 0.25 | 2 (640) | 0.75 (0.60, 0.94) | 0.01 | Â |
McDonald 2010 [44] | 9 (5,225) | −120 (−248, 6.8) | 0.06 | 9 (5,225) | 0.92 (0.72, 1.16) | 0.46 | 9 (5,225) | 1.12 (0.99, 1.26) | 0.07 | 9/10 primary studies accessed |
Murphy 2011 [45] | 8 (179,589) | −121 (−199, −43) | < 0.01 | 12 (1,110,176) | 1.45 (1.21, 1.73) | < 0.01 | 8 (179,589) | 1.46 (1.10, 1.94) | 0.01 |  |
Reveiz 2011 [46] | 3 (237) | 15 (−111, 142) | 0.81 | 1 (100) | Not estimated | NA | 3 (237) | 0.95 (0.59, 1.52) | 0.83 | Zero cases of LBW in both treatment arms of primary study |
Salmasi 2010 [47] | 44 (71,663) | 13 (−105, 131) | 0.83 | 18 (40,790) | 1.09 (0.88, 1.35) | 0.44 | 44 (71,663) | 0.98 (0.77, 1.23) | 0.85 | 18/19 primary studies of LBW outcome accessed |
Whitworth 2010 [48] | 5 (23,213) | 11 (−20, 41) | 0.49 | 8 (19,337) | 1.04 (0.82, 1.33) | 0.73 | 5 (23,213) | 0.97 (0.87, 1.08) | 0.56 |  |
Wiysonge 2011 [49] | 3 (1,809) | 68 (19, 118) | 0.01 | 4 (2,606) | 0.83 (0.68, 1.01) | 0.07 | 3 (1,809) | 0.84 (0.74, 0.95) | 0.01 | Â |
 | Number of studies (sample size) | Mean difference (g) (95% CI) | P -value | Number of studies (sample size) | OR (95% CI) | P- value | Number of studies (sample size) | Distributional OR (95% CI) | P -value |  |
Pope 2010 [50] | 5 (13,955) | 100 (73, 128) | < 0.01 | 8 (Unclear) | 1.38 (1.25, 1.52) | < 0.01 | 5 (13,955) | 0.81 (0.76, 0.86) | < 0.01 | Pooled published pre-calculated estimates for LBW outcome (that is Log(OR) and SE) |
Salvig 2010a[51] | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
(Fixed effects model) | 4 (1,187) | 66 (1.6, 131) | 0.04 | 3 (785) | 0.98 (0.66, 1.46) | 0.93 | 4 (1,187) | 0.81 (0.65, 1.01) | 0.07 | Â |
Salvig 2010a[51] | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
(Random effects model) | 4 (1,187) | 68 (−75, 212) | 0.35 | 3 (785) | 0.95 (0.49, 1.85) | 0.88 | 4 (1,187) | 0.79 (0.48, 1.29) | 0.34 |  |