Reporting quality of statistical methods in surgical observational studies: protocol for systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Rodgers|
|27 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Forough Farrokhyar|
|8 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Guillaume Martel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Forough Farrokhyar|
|2 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Guillaume Martel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|28 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/2046-4053-3-70|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.