Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary table for accepted studies—infection prevention and control policies and specific interventions

From: Use of ward closure to control outbreaks among hospitalized patients in acute care settings: a systematic review

 

Setting (beds); country

Study length

Definition of ward closure

Main interventions

Outcomes

Gastrointestinal: norovirus

Haill et al. [13]

Teaching hospital (1200); England

2005–2011

Unspecified closure

2005–2007: ward closure; meet criteria before reopening; terminal cleaning

Many norovirus outbreaks can be controlled by bay closures when combined with adequate infection control support

2007–2011: isolation and cohorting in bays to facilitate disinfection

New policy led to reduction in: duration of closure from 6d to 5d and bed-days lost from 180 to 96

Illingworth et al. [12]

Teaching hospital (1100); England

2006–2010

Unspecified bay closures

2006–2008: Early ward closure

New policy led to significant reduction in: length of closure (p < 0 .041) and in bed-days lost (p < 0.001)

2008–2010: Closure of ward bays; architectural installation; environmental disinfections; enlarged infection control team

Other and multiple/mixed systems with predominant infection Acinetobacter baumannii

García et al., 2009 [114]

2 ICUs (30, 24) at a tertiary hospital (934); Spain

2006–2007

Unspecified sequential closure

Cleaning/disinfection (intervention); clinical procedures limited; isolation; dedicated HCW; contact precautions; HCW and environmental screening; education

Cleaning/disinfection led to a decrease from 3.2 to 1.6 episodes per 100 patients, and incidence density of 9.2 to 5 infections per 1000d of stay

Other and multiple/mixed systems with combination of colonization and infection: Staphylococcus aureus

Farrington et al. [111]

Teaching hospital (1000); England

1985–1997

No new admissions; limited transfers

1985–1994: MRSA screening upon admission to ICU; isolation; ward closure; disinfection

Relaxation of policy and increase MRSA upon admission led to an increased in MRSA cases from 1 to 2 in 1994 to 74 cases in 1997

1994–1997: relaxed closure/reopen and screening criteria

Selkon et al. [112]

General hospital (1000 beds); England

1967–1978

Unspecified closure

1967–1972: ward closure; standard barrier nursing methods

Ward closure and barrier nursing did not control the outbreaks

1972–1978: limited transfer; construction of a isolation unit with control ventilation

New policy led to reduction in incidence rate of MRSA infection from 6.57 to 5.08 cases per 1000 admissions; from 130 to 14 cases of infection

Combination of colonization and infection: Clostridium difficile and Staphylococcus aureus

Stone et al. [113]

Acute medical wards (66) at an acute geriatrics hospital; England

1994–1996

Unspecified closure

1994–1995: ward closure; national guidelines

Ward closure and national guidelines did not control the outbreaks

1995–1996: hand hygiene; education/ communication; antimicrobial treatment restricted

New policy led to reduction in: incidence rate of C. difficile infection from 3.35 cases to 1.94 cases per 100 admissions (p < 0.05), and MRSA incidence from 3.95 to 194 cases per 100 admissions (p < 0.01)

  1. d days, w weeks, m months, y years