Dimension | Indicators | Multiple behavioral outcomes (n = 26) | Weight (n = 2) | Disease self-management (n = 4) | Physical activity (n = 8) | Diet (n = 4) | Smoking/substance (n = 12) | Others (n = 10) | No individual behavior outcome (n = 16) | Total across all behaviors (N = 82) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reach | Average participation rate | 49 % (±25) Studies (n = 18) | 19 % (±12) Studies (n = 2) | 24 % (±31) Studies (n = 2) | 54 % (±26) Studies (n = 4) | N/A | 52 % (±34) Studies (n = 6) | 30 % (±18) Studies (n = 6) | 44 % (±27) Studies (n = 11) | 45 % (±28) Studies (n = 45) |
Average number of comparisons between participants and nonparticipants | 4.92 (±4.07) R 1–13 Studies (n = 13) | N/A | N/A | 3.75 (±2.50) R 1–7 Studies (n = 4) | 2.00 (±1.41) R 1–3 Studies (n = 2) | 5.00 (±3.00) R 2–8 Studies (n = 3) | 2.00 (±21.73) R 1–4 Studies (n = 3) | 1.75 (±0.95) R 1–3 Studies (n = 4) | 4.01 (±3.53) R 1–13 Studies (n = 39) | |
Average number of significant comparisons | 1.63 (±0.74) R 1–3 Studies (n = 8) | N/A | N/A | 2.00 (±1.41) R 1–3 Studies (n = 2) | N/A | 2.50 (±2.12) R 1–4 Studies (n = 2) | N/A | N/A | 1.05 (±1.4) R 0–13 Studies (n = 39) | |
Effectiveness | Measure of primary outcome | Positive (n = 20) null (n = 3) misreport (n = 0) not reported (n = 3) | Positive (n = 2) null (n = 0) misreport (n = 0) not reported (n = 0) | Positive (n = 2) null (n = 0) misreport (n = 0) not reported (n = 2) | Positive (n = 6) null (n = 1) misreport (n = 1) not reported (n = 0) | Positive (n = 4) null (n = 0) misreport (n = 0) not reported (n = 0) | Positive (n = 8) null (n = 1) misreport (n = 1) not reported (n = 2) | Positive (n = 6) null (n = 1) misreport (n = 3) not reported (n = 0) | N/A (n = 8) misreport (n = 8) | Positive (n =48) null (n = 6) misreport (n = 13) not reported (n = 7) N/A (n = 8) |
Maintenancea | Measure of primary outcome ≥6 months post-treatment | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 6) not reported (n = 20) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 0) not reported (n = 2) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 0) not reported (n = 4) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 1) not reported (n = 7) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 0) not reported (n = 4) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 2) not reported (n = 10) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 0) not reported (n = 10) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 0) not reported (n = 16) | Improved outcome from baseline to follow-up (n = 9) not reported (n = 73) |
Adoption | Average percentage of settings approached that participate | 73 % (±35) Studies (n = 12) | N/A | 93 % (±10) Studies (n = 2) | 65 % (±37) Studies (n = 5) | N/A | 68 % (±33) Studies (n = 3) | 95 % (±7) Studies (n = 5) | 56 % (±40) Studies (n = 5) | 75 % (±32) (n = 33) |
Average number of comparisons between participating sites compared with nonparticipating | 2.60 (±2.19) R 1–5 Studies (n = 5) | N/A | N/A | 2.50 (±2.07) R 1–6 Studies (n = 6) | N/A | N/A | 1.00 (±0.00) Studies (n = 2) | 1.00 (±0.00) Studies (n = 3) | 0.56 (±0.98) Studies (n = 32) | |
Average number of significant comparisons | 1.0 (± .25) R 0–5 Studies (n = 4) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 (±0.00) Studies (n = 2) | 0.32 (±0.58) Studies (n = 20) | |
Percent of staff offered that participate | 76 % (±32) Studies (n = 5) | N/A | N/A | 85 % (±22) Studies (n = 3) | N/A | N/A | 95 % (±7) Studies (n = 3) | 85 % (±15) Studies (n = 3) | 79 % (±28) Studies (n = 12) | |
Characteristics of staff participants vs nonparticipating staff or typical staff | 2.50 (±2.12) R 1–3 Studies (n = 2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.00 (±0.00) Studies (n = 5) | 1.92 (±1.68) Studies (n = 12) | |
Average number of significant comparisons | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.08 (±0.29) Studies (n = 12) | |
Implementation | Measure of implementation fidelity | Description (n = 5) Percentage (n = 10) M = 87 % (±17) | Description (n = 1) Percentage (n = 1) | Description (n = 1) | Description (n = 2) Percentage (n = 4) M = 71 % (±12.23) | Percentage (n = 1) | Description (n = 1) Percentage (n = 3) M = 84 % (±10.40) | Description (n = 1) Percentage (n = 2) M = 76 % (±33.23) | Description (n = 5) | Those that described (n = 21) Average percentage 82 % (±16) |
Cost of implementation—money | n = 2 (1) $547 per person, (2) “low cost” | n = 1 Lay health educators and free program materials | n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 0 | n = 3 (1) $6.91/person, (2) low ongoing costs, (3) 266,000 Euros for 3 years | Costs reported in six studies | |
Maintenanceb | Reported if program is still ongoing at ≥6 months post-treatment | Studies (n = 1) | Studies (n = 1) | Studies (n = 0) | Studies (n = 5) | Studies (n = 3) | Studies (n = 1) | Studies (n = 3) | Studies (n = 7) | Studies (n = 27) |