Do alternative methods for analysing count data produce similar estimates? Implications for meta-analyses
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vasudeva Guddattu|
|17 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jayadevan Sreedharan|
|16 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Herbison|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2015||Editorially accepted|
|17 Nov 2015||Article published||10.1186/s13643-015-0144-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.