Skip to main content

Table 1 Limitations of existing reviews identified by a systematic search of literature

From: Local anesthetic injections with or without steroid for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Serial No

Main Objective

Relevant Findings and Limitations

Studies relevant to our Review

1

A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating the "control" injections in epidural injections for spinal pain [35].

FINDINGS: As control injections, epidural non-steroid injections may provide some benefit, but were inferior to ESI, but superior to non-epidural injections.

Anderberg 2007 [80]; Beliveau 1971[81]; Brevik 1996 [82]; Cohen 2012 [83]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; Ghahreman 2010 [85]; Klenerman 1984 [86]; Manchikanti 2008 [87], 2011 [88], 2012abcd [89–92]; Nam & Park 2011 [93]; Ng 2005 [94]; Rogers 1992 [95]; Sayegh 2009 [96]; Tafazal 2009 [97]

LIMITATIONS: All LA and saline comparators were grouped as epidural non-steroid agents.

2

To assess comparative effectiveness studies in ESI for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and to estimate reimbursement amounts [37].

FINDINGS: Both, ESIs or LA epidural injections alone, resulted in better short term improvement (pain and walking distance); no longer term difference.

Fukusaki-1998 [98]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; El Zahaar 1991 [99]

LIMITATIONS: Included both RCTs and OSs; no metaanalysis.

3

Effectiveness of cervical epidural injections in the management of chronic neck and upper extremity pain [38].

FINDINGS: Similar effectiveness with both LA only and LA+ steroid injections, except for slightly better results with radiculitis from disc herniations

4 by Manchikanti: 2010 [100]; 2012a; 2012b; 2012c [101–103]

LIMITATIONS: Included RCTs had differences in the injectate used with intervention and control arms; no metaanalysis.

5

Effectiveness and risks of image guided cervical TFESI [30].

FINDINGS: Limited evidence exists and no conclusion on effectiveness and risks can be observed.

Anderberg 2007 [80]

LIMITATIONS: Included three RCTs, only one of which compared LA+ steroid with LA only

6

Role of ESIs in the prevention of surgery for spinal pain [36].

FINDINGS: ESIs may provide a small surgery-sparing effect in the short term compared with control injections.

Hegihara 2008 [104]; Klenerman 1984 [86]; Cohen 2012 [83]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; Ghahreman 2010 [85]; Riew 2000 [105]; Sayegh 2009 [96]; Tafazal 2009 [97];

LIMITATIONS: Looked only at surgery sparing effects; no metaanalysis

7

ESIs in the management of sciatica [6].

FINDINGS: Small short term benefit in pain control with ESIs.

Manchikanti 2010a,b; Ghahreman 2010 [85]; Tafazal 2009 [97]; Ng 2005 [94]; Rogers 1992 [95]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; Klenerman 1984 [86]; Swerdlow 1970 [106]

LIMITATIONS: No differentiation was made with the injectate used in control and treatment arm. Could not incorporate dichotomous outcome measures into pooling.

8

The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar ESIs in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain [33].

FINDINGS: Similar results with both LA only and LA+ steroid injections, except for slightly better results with radiculitis from disc herniations.

Manchikanti 2010a,b [107, 108]; Cuckler 1985; Rogers 1992

LIMITATIONS: Included both RCTs and OSs without any pooling.

9

Predicting ESIs with lab markers and imaging techniques [68].

LIMITATIONS: Only aimed at prognostic accuracy of certain predictive methods used to determine ESI outcomes.

None

10

A systematic evaluation of thoracic ESIs [34].

FINDING: The single RCT showed similar effectiveness with LA or LA +steroid.

Manchikanti. 2010 [109]

LIMITATIONS: Only one RCT, and one OS were included

11

Effectiveness of TFESI for lumbar radiculopathy [39].

FINDINGS: Small improvement with steroids in pain only (short term); long term follow up showed no difference with steroids.

Riew 2000 [105]; Ng 2005 [94]; Tafazal 2009 [97]

LIMITATIONS: Included only five RCTs, and for pooling control groups included both LA and Saline; outcomes as SMD

12

Evaluation of therapeutic lumbar TFESIs [42].

FINDINGS: Lack of evidence

Riew 2000 [105]; Riew 2006 [110]

LIMITATIONS: Only four RCTs; no metaanalysis; comparators varied in each study

13

Efficacy of lumbosacral TFESIs: a systematic review [49].

FINDINGS: Fair evidence supporting TFESIs as superior to placebo for treating radicular symptoms.

Riew 2000 [105]; Ng 2005 [94]

LIMITATIONS: Evaluation specific to TFESI; no metaanalysis; varied comparators.

14

Evaluation of perineural steroids for trauma and compression-related peripheral neuropathic pain [41].

FINDINGS: At 1–3 months post-interventions, steroid group reported lower pain scores than those who received LA or conventional care.

Karakadas 2011, 2012 [111, 112]; Eker 2012 [113]; Thomson 2013 [114]

LIMITATIONS: Review limited to compression neuropathies; comparators for pooling included no injection, or LA, or placebo (saline).

16

Evaluation of PNBs and TPIs in headache [40].

FINDINGS: Lack of studies and inherent limitations within the included studies.

Ashkenazi 2008 [115]

LIMITATIONS: Did not identify any study on TPI; both RCTs and non-RCTS were included; no assessment of risk; no metaanalysis.

17

Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome [43].

FINDINGS: Local steroid injection is recommended before surgery.

Armstrong 2004 [116]

LIMITATIONS: A report as guidelines for management based on previous systematic reviews; however no differentiation between steroids with or without LA.

18

Neural blockade for persistent pain after breast cancer surgery [69].

FINDINGS: Lack of evidence.

None

LIMITATIONS: Only two RCTs on stellate ganglion block.

19

Occipital nerve blocks: when and what to inject [52].

LIMITATIONS: Narrative review with search obtained from google scholar and MD consult

Afridi 2006 [117]; Ambrosini 2005 [118]; Ashkenazi 2008 [115]

20

IA infiltration therapy for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis [70].

FINDINGS: No clear conclusions on the use of IA steroid due to lack of evidence.

None

LIMITATIONS: Studies of all kinds of injection treatments; only two RCTs of IA injection involving hyaluronic acid.

21

A metaanalysis of steroid injections for painful shoulder [32].

FINDINGS: Subacromial injections of steroids are effective for improvement for rotator cuff tendonitis, and are better than NSAIDS and placebo injections.

Blair 1996 [119]; Plafki 2000 [120]; Vecchio 1993 [121]

LIMITATIONS: Out of five RCTs included for pooling only three compared LA + steroid vs LA; results not considered separately.

22

Review of glenohumeral steroid injections in adhesive capsulitis [71].

FINDINGS: Steroids injections offer good short-term outcomes when compared to physical therapy and other treatments.

None

LIMITATIONS: Although 16 RCTs were included, none of them compared LA + steroid with only LA.

23

Assessment of Subacromial steroid injections in the treatment of rotator cuff disease [44].

FINDINGS: Little reproducible evidence to support the efficacy of subacromial steroid injections in managing rotator cuff disease.

Akgun 2004 [122]; Alvarez 2005 [123]; Blair 1996 [119]; Petri 1987 [124]; Withrington 1985 [125]

LIMITATIONS: Out of nine RCTs, three involved patients with acute pain; no metaanalysis; varying comparators within the studies.

24

IA cortisone injection for osteoarthritis of the hip. Is it effective and safe [46]?

FINDINGS: Lack of clear evidence; steroid injections are better in refractory pain; of the four RCTs- two of the trials showed opposite results with LA vs LA + steroid

Lambert 2007 [126]; Flanagan 1988 [128]

LIMITATIONS: Identified only four RCTs; no metaanalysis.

25

Is anesthetic Hip Joint Injection Useful in Diagnosing Hip Osteoarthritis? A Meta-Analysis of Case Series [72].

LIMITATIONS: Only non-RCTs, and does not allow for clear conclusions or directions.

None

26

Injection therapies in LE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs [45].

FINDINGS: No statistically significant difference in benefit compared with placebo for steroid injections.

LIMITATIONS: Network meta-analysis involving 10 trials of steroid injections; LA was not considered as a separate comparison group vs LA+ steroid.

Dogramaci 2009 [128]; Lindenhovious 2008 [129]; Newcomer 2001 [130]; Price 1991a,b [131, 132]

27

Treating LE with steroid injections or physiotherapy: a systematic review [48].

FINDINGS: For steroid vs LA injection, the evidence is conflicting; steroid injections have a short term beneficial effect, but a negative effect in the intermediate term.

Lindenhovious 2008 [129]; Newcomer 2001 [130]; Price 1991 [131]

LIMITATIONS: Outcomes pooled separately, and expressed as SMD for continuous and RD for dichotomous

28

To assess the effectiveness of interventions for cubital tunnel syndrome, radial tunnel syndrome, instability, or bursitis of the elbow: a systematic review [73].

FINDINGS: No or limited evidence found for the effectiveness of nonsurgical and surgical interventions; lack of good controlled studies.

None

LIMITATIONS: Various interventions with varying comparators; no studies relevant to LA vs LA +steroid; no metaanalysis.

30

To evaluate the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis [51].

FINDINGS: For studies (3) comparing LA vs steroid, beneficial effects were found favoring steroid injections.

Price 1991 [131]

LIMITATIONS: Out of 15 RCTs, five compared LA with LA and steroid. Outcomes with various comparators pooled together.

31

Non-surgical treatment of LE: a systematic review of RCTs [50].

FINDINGS: Existing literature does not provide conclusive evidence for a preferred mode of nonsurgical treatment.

Lindenhovious 2008 [129]; Newcomer 2001 [130]; Dogramaci 2009 [128]; Altay 2002 [130]

LIMITATIONS: Various non-surgical treatments were considered together; no metaanalysis

32

Assessing the efficacy and safety of steroid injections and other injections for management of tendinopathy [12].

FINDINGS: For LE: Steroid injections reduced pain in the short term; but studies comparing only LA showed conflicting results; rotator tendinopathy results are conflicting; Achilles and Patellar tendinopathies-no studies of comparison; ME-no benefit from steroid injection.

LE: Lindenhovious 2008 [129]; Newcomer 2001 [130]; Price 1991 [131]

ME: Stahl 1997 [134]

LIMITATIONS: The effect of steroid injections were compared using all comparators; no separate analysis with LA + steroid vs only LA.

RT: Adebajo 1990 [135]; Alvarez 2005 [123]; Blair 1996 [119]; Ekeberg 2009 [136]; Mclnerney 2003 [137]

33

Evaluation of minimally invasive therapies in the management of chronic calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff. [74].

FINDINGS: Lack of evidence.

None

LIMITATIONS: Did not identify any studies comparing steroid injection with LA.

34

Efficacy of treatment of trochanteric bursitis: a systematic review [75].

FINDINGS: Lack of evidence.

None

LIMITATIONS: Only one RCT for steroid injection assessing image guidance.

35

Evaluation of non-operative management of discogenic back pain [76].

FINDINGS: Lack of evidence.

None

LIMITATIONS: Identified only two RCTs performing intradiscal steroid injections; no study compared LA + steroid vs LA

36

Evaluation of various modes of diagnosis and treatment of suspected discogenic pain [77].

FINDINGS: There is lack of diagnostic criteria and lack of studies with uniform treatment strategies.

None

LIMITATIONS: Did not identify any suitable RCTs.

37

Evaluation of therapeutic thoracic facet joint interventions [47].

FINDINGS: Paucity of evidence, but one trial showed no difference between LA+ steroid vs LA.

Manchikanti 2012 [138]

LIMITATIONS: Identified only one RCT on nerve block; no study on joint injections

38

Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar facet joint interventions [53].

FINDINGS: Paucity of evidence, but one trial showed no difference between LA+ steroid vs LA.

Manchikanti 2001 [139]

LIMITATIONS: Identified only one RCT on nerve block; no study on joint injections.

39

Emerging concepts in the treatment of myofascial pain: a review of medications, modalities, and needle-based interventions [78].

FINDINGS: There is insufficient evidence for both medications and needle based interventions for myofascial pain.

None

LIMITATIONS: Did not identify any RCT comparing LA + steroid vs LA.

40

To assess the efficacy and safety of using TPI to treat patients with chronic non-malignant musculoskeletal pain [79].

FINDINGS: No clear evidence to support the use of TPI.

None

LIMITATIONS: Did not identify any RCT comparing LA + steroid vs LA.

41

To compare the efficacy of saline, LA, and steroids in epidural and facet joint injections for the management of spinal pain [18].

FINDINGS: LA with steroids and LA alone were equally effective except in disc herniation, where the superiority of LA with steroids was demonstrated over LA alone.

Anderberg 2007 [80]; Beliveau 1971 [81]; Brevik 1996 [82]; Cohen 2012 [83]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; Ghahreman 2010 [85]; Klenerman 1984 [86]; Manchikanti 2008 [87], 2011 [88], 2012abcd [89–92]; Nam & Park 2011 [93]; Ng 2005 [94]; Rogers 1992 [95]; Sayegh 2009 [96]; Tafazal 2009 [97]

LIMITATIONS: RCTs involving the injections of sodium chloride solution was also included as active comparator, along with LA alone injections.

Studies were not excluded based on the duration of chronic pain.

No metaanalysis was done.

42

To assess the benefits and harms of ESIs in adults with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis of any duration [31].

FINDINGS: For radiculopathy, small effect favoring the use of steroids for short term reduction in pain and function. No evidence of benefit in spinal stenosis.

Anderberg 2007 [80]; Beliveau 1971 [81]; Brevik 1996 [82]; Cohen 2012 [83]; Cuckler 1985 [84]; Ghahreman 2010 [85]; Klenerman 1984 [86]

LIMTATIONS: Combined all non-steroid agents as placebo comparators.

Focused on radicular pain, but included studies of any duration.

  1. Abbreviations: LA local anesthetic; RCT randomized control trial; OS observational study; ESI epidural steroid injection; TFESI transforaminal epidural steroid injection; SMD standard mean deviation; PNB peripheral nerve block; TPI trigger point injection; LE lateral epicondylitis; ME medial epicondylitis; RD risk difference; IA intra-articular injection