Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kath Wright
25 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino
15 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Wichor Bramer
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kath Wright
4 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino
9 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Wichor Bramer
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement