Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kath Wright|
|25 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino|
|15 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Wichor Bramer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kath Wright|
|4 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shannon Robalino|
|9 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Wichor Bramer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|1 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.