Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Hilfiker|
|18 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaime Peters|
|14 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Jørgensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lars Jørgensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|10 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s13643-016-0259-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.