Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of findings and quality of evidence table

From: A systematic review of St. John’s wort for major depressive disorder

Outcome

Study design: number of studies, number of participants

Findings: direction and magnitude of effect

GRADE

Comparison: SJW vs. placebo

 Depression, number of treatment responders

18 RCTs, N = 2922

RR 1.53 (1.19, 1.97), favors SJW

Moderatea

 Depression scale score

16 RCTs, N = 2888

SMD 0.49 (0.23, 0.74), favors SJW

Moderatea

 Depression remission

9 RCTs, N = 1419

RR 1.69 (0.63, 4.55), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Depression relapse

1 RCT, N = 426

RR 0.70 (0.49, 1.02), n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Quality of life—mental

2 RCTs, N = 358

SMD 0.48 (0.24, 0.73), favors SJW

Lowb

 Quality of life—physical

2 RCTs, N = 358

SMD 0.28 (−1.03, 0.47), n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Number of patients with adverse events

13 RCTs, N = 2600

OR 0.83 (0.62, 1.13), n.s.

Moderateb

 Serious adverse events

6 RCTs, N = 1358

OR 0.26 (0.04, 1.23), n.s.

Moderatea

 Gastrointestinal/metabolic/nutritional adverse events

16 RCTs, N = 2490

OR 1.06 (0.83, 1.41), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Neurologic/nervous system adverse events

14 RCTs, N = 2404

OR 1.56 (1.08, 3.32) SJW more AE

Lowa,b

 Skin/musculoskeletal adverse events

10 RCTs, N = 1978

OR 1.47 (0.98, 2.21), n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Photosensitivity

4 RCTs, N = 1054

OR 1.10 (0.36, 3.56), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Respiratory/infectious adverse events

7 RCTs, N = 1081

OR 1.48 (0.95, 2.33), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Other organ system (eye, ear, liver, renal, reproductive) adverse events

5 RCTs, N = 1054

OR 1.87 (1.08, 3.32), SJW more AE

Lowa,b

 Cardiovascular adverse events

4 RCTs, N = 759

OR 6.81 (0.92, 304.08), n.s.

Very lowa,b,d

 Psychiatric adverse events

3 RCTs, N = 608

OR 1.61 (0.34, 10.21), n.s.

Very lowa,b,d

 Sexual dysfunction adverse events

2 RCTs, N = 428

OR 1.92 (0.94, 4.00), n.s.

Very lowa,b,d

Comparison: SJW vs. antidepressant

 Depression, number of treatment responders

17 RCTs, N = 2776

RR 1.01 (0.90, 1.14), n.s.

Moderateb

 Depression scale score

14 RCTs, N = 2248

SMD 0.03 (−0.15, 0.21), n.s.

Moderateb

 Depression remission

7 RCTs, N = 787

RR 1.17 (0.84, 1.62), n.s.

Lowb

 Depression relapse

1 RCT, N = 241

RR 4.17 (0.47, 33.33), n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Quality of life—mental

1 RCT, N = 216

SMD −0.11 (−0.15, 0.38), n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Quality of life—physical

1 RCT, N = 153

SMD 0.35 (0.01, 0.70), favors SJW

Very lowa,b

 Number of patients with adverse events

11 RCTs, N = 1946

OR 0.67 (0.56, 0.81), favors SJW

Moderatea

 Serious adverse events

4 RCTs, N = 805

OR 0.62 (0.05, 5.46) n.s.

Lowa,b

 Gastrointestinal/metabolic/nutritional adverse events

15 RCTs, N = 2491

OR 0.43 (0.34, 0.55) favors SJW

Lowa,b

 Neurologic/nervous system adverse events

15 RCTs, N = 2492

OR 0.29 (0.24, 0.36) favors SJW

Lowa,b

 Skin/musculoskeletal adverse events

10 RCTs, N = 1587

OR 1.18 (0.79, 1.78) n.s.

Lowa,b

 Respiratory/infectious adverse events

2 RCTs, N = 352

OR 1.25 (0.70, 2.25) n.s.

Very lowa,b

 Other organ system (eye, ear, liver, renal, reproductive) adverse events

4 RCTs, N = 761

OR 0.85 (0.52, 1.38), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Cardiovascular adverse events

5 RCTs, N = 750

OR 0.55 (0.26, 1.16), n.s.

Lowa,b

 Psychiatric adverse events

4 RCTs, N = 552

OR 0.41 (0.19, 0.87) favors SJW

Very lowa,b

 Sexual dysfunction adverse events

2 RCTs, N = 301

OR 0.51 (0.30, 0.88) favors SJW

Lowa,b

Effect of depression severity

 Depression, treatment responders

18 RCTs, N = 2922

Meta-regression did not suggest differences between patient subgroups

(p = 0.798)

Very lowa,c

 Depression scale score

16 RCTs, N = 2888

Meta-regression did not suggest differences between patient subgroups

(p = 0.365)

Very lowa,c

 Depression remission

9 RCTs, N = 1507

Meta-regression did not suggest differences between patient subgroups

(p = 0.159)

Very lowa,c

 Number of patients with adverse events

13 RCTs, N = 2600

Meta-regression did not suggest differences between patient subgroups

(p = 0.480)

Very lowa,c

  1. Quality of evidence was downgraded (by 1 or by 2, depending on the severity) for the following
  2. aInconsistency (heterogeneity, direction of effects; no replication)
  3. bStudy limitations (no good quality study; effect not present when excluding poor quality studies; studies not designed or not powered to assess outcome)
  4. cIndirectness (no head-to-head trials, effect based on indirect comparison)
  5. dImprecision (wide confidence interval)
  6. SJW St. John’s wort, n.s. not statistically significantly different, AE adverse event