Skip to main content

Table 1 Distribution of abstracts by year and characteristics

From: A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

2012

n = 84

2014

n = 59

2015

n = 61

All

N = 204

Journals

 - Annals of Internal Medicine

12 (14.3)

13 (22.0)

11 (18.0)

36 (17.6)

 - BMC Medicine

4 (4.8)

8 (13.6)

10 (16.4)

22 (10.8)

 - BMJ

31 (36.9)

18 (30.5)

18 (29.5)

67 (32.8)

 - JAMA

6 (7.1)

6 (10.2)

4 (6.6)

16 (7.8)

 - JAMA Internal Medicine/Archives of Internal Medicine

13 (15.5)

11 (18.6)

4 (6.6)

28 (13.7)

 - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

1 (1.2)

3 (5.1)

0

4 (2.0)

 - NEJM

1 (1.2)

0

0

1 (0.5)

 - PLOS Medicine

6 (7.1)

0

0

6 (2.9)

 - The Lancet

10 (11.9)

0

14 (23.0)

24 (11.8)

Mean number of authors

8.2 (5.8)

8.4 (5.4)

9.1 (4.9)

8.5 (5.4)

Abstract format

    

 - IMRAD

35 (41.7)

12 (20.3)

25 (41.0)

72 (35.3)

 - 8-headings

49 (58.3)

47 (79.7)

36 (59.0)

132 (64.7)

PRISMA endorser journals

 - Yes

57 (67.9)

43 (72.9)

50 (82.0)

150 (73.5)

 - No

27 (32.1)

16 (27.1)

11 (18.0)

54 (26.5)

Publication on behalf of a group

    

 - Yes

8 (9.5)

4 (6.8)

7 (11.5)

19 (9.3)

 - No

76 (90.5)

55 (93.2)

54 (88.5)

185 (90.7)

Actual observed abstract word count

 - <300

14 (16.7)

16 (27.1)

11 (18.0)

41 (20.1)

 - ≥300

70 (83.3)

43 (72.9)

50 (82.0)

163 (79.9)

  1. Data are n (%) or mean (standard deviation)