Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included trials

From: Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions

ID

Authors

Date

Design

Intervention

Control

Participant characteristics

Sample size

Outcomes measured

Effect size (d)

1

Alzua, Cruces, & Lopez-Erazo [30]

2013

Exp

Entra21

Classroom

Internship

Basic skills

884 h

No contact

Argentinian

Below poverty line

Unemployed

18–30

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 23.55 (I), 23.80 (C)

33% male

407 randomised.

407 analysed.

Employment status

Receipt of welfare

Credit standing

N credit enquiries

.154

2

Attanasio, Kugler, & Meghir [29]

2011

Exp

Jóvenes en Acción

Classroom

On-the-job

6 months, 5 h per day

Wait-list

Columbian

Unemployed

Lowest deciles of income distribution/Poor youth in urban areas

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 21.1 (I), 21.22 (C)

44.4%male

4353 randomised

3549 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings

 

3

Bloom, Orr, Cave, Bell, & Doolittle [33]

1993

Exp

JTPA II-A

Classroom

On-the-job

Other services

3–5 months

Some received classroom training only.

USA

Economically disadvantaged, facing barriers to employment.

45% male

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 19

4793 randomised.

4048 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings

Achieved HSD or GED

 

4

Borland, Tseng, & Wilkins [31]

2013

Exp

YP4

Case management

23 meetings, 2 years

Standard service delivery

Australian

Homeless (or history of homelessness/disadvantage) job seekers

18–35

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 23.34 (I), 22.92 (C)

445 recruited.

208-355 analysed.

Employment status N days income support

Receipt of welfare

DEEWR programme expenditure Health and Wellbeing Community activities Housing

 

5

Borland, & Tseng [34]

2007

Quasi

Job seekers diary

Work search verification

Fortnightly, 3 months

Standard service delivery

Australian

18–24

54,923 analysed (whole sample).

Receipt of welfare

 

6

Card, Ibarrarán, Regalia, Rosas-Shady, & Soares [35]

2011

Exp

Juventud y Empleo

Basic skills Internship

350 h

Not specified

Dominican Republic

44.5% male

Lowest income members of working age population

5723 realised treatment group, 1623 realised control group.

Employment status

Earnings

 

7

Cave, Bos, Doolittle & Toussaint [28]

1993

Exp

Jobstart Basic skills

Occupational training

800 h, 6.6 months

400 hours, not Jobstart.

USA

Economically disadvantaged

School drop-outs

Low skilled 17-21 53.5% male

2312 randomised.

1491 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings

Receipt of welfare

Receipt of education

Receipt of qualification

Pregnancy

Criminal activity

 

8

Chen [36]

2013

Exp

Job Corps

Academic Vocational Social skills

8 months residential

Wait list (3 years)

USA

Disadvantaged

Low income household

16–24

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) 18.42 (I), 18.38 (C)

15,386 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings(weekly)

Receipt of welfare

 

9

Creed, Machin, & Hicks [37]

1996

Quasi

Youth Conservation Corps Work experience

Classroom training

16 weeks

Wait list

Australian

Unemployed >6 months

67% male (I), 52% (C)

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 18.76 (I), 18.71 (C)

245 randomised.

82 analysed.

Self-esteem

Psyc. distress

 

10

Creed, Machin, & Hicks [38]

1999

Quasi

Unnamed

Work experience

6–12 months

Wait list

Australian

54% male

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 19

Unemployed ≥12 months

Eligible for government sponsored programmes

65 randomised.

32 analysed at F3.

Psyc. distress

Self-esteem

 

11

Donovan, Oddy, Pardoe, & Ades [39]

1986

Quasi

Youth Opportunity Programme Work experience6–12 months

Did not access programme; unemployed.

UK

\( \overline{x}\ \mathrm{age} \) = 15.93 at T1

65% male

81 analysed.

Health status

 

12

Stafford [40]

1982

Quasi

Youth Opportunity Programme

Work experience

6–12 months

Did not access programme; unemployed.

UK

16–18 54% male

133 analysed.

Health (GHQ)

 

13

Mounsey [41]

2002

Quasi

Youth training scheme

Further education

Placements

On-the-job

Duration not stated

No treatment; matched.

UK

16–17 at T1

Varied by analysis: 972 to 8885.

NEET status

Expected earnings and reservation wages

 

14

Nafilyan, & Speckesser [42]

2014

Quasi

Youth Contract

Individually tailored support

12 months est.

Matched (counterfactual); same educational attainment and probability of receiving intervention.

UK

16–18

11,144 received intervention.

NEET status

 

15

Schochet, McConnell, & Burghardt [43]

2003

Exp

Job Corps

Educational

Vocational

Counselling

Placements

8 months residential

Other services; not Job Corps.

USA

Disadvantaged—living in a household that receives welfare or is below the poverty line, and living in an environment that impairs prospects for participating in other programmes. Free of serious behavioural and medical problems. 60% males>70% members of racial or ethnic minoritygroups 16–24

15, 406 randomised.

11,313 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings

 

16

Schochet, Burghardt, & Glazerman [44]

2001

Exp

Job Corps

Educational

Vocational

Counselling

Placements

8 months residential

Other services; not Job Corps.

As trial 15

15, 406 randomised.

11,313 analysed.

Employment status

Earnings

Receipt of welfare

Receipt of education

Health status

Criminal activity

 

17

Tanner, Purdon, D’Souza, & Finch [32]

2009

Quasi

Activity Agreement pilots

One-to-one support

Individually tailored contract

Financial incentives

15 weeks

Standard service delivery; matched from non-participating areas.

England

58% males

16–17

NEET for >20 weeks

Not receiving JSA.

1018 analysed at F1, 229 analysed at F2.

Education and employment

Confidence and independence

 

18

Grace & Gill [45]

2014

Quasi

YP4

Case management

23 meetings, 2 years

Standard service delivery

Australian

Homeless (or history of homelessness/disadvantage) Job seekers

18–35

422 assigned, 370 analysed.

Earnings

Welfare receipt

Housing