Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods for objectively assessing clinical masticatory performance: protocol for a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Feb 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Meinert
9 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma J Ridley
14 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Per Elgestad Stjernfeldt
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reint Meursinge Reynders
10 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Per Elgestad Stjernfeldt
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reint Meursinge Reynders
16 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Per Elgestad Stjernfeldt
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13643-016-0403-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement