Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?—two systematic reviews
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Page|
|9 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mufiza Kapadia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Page|
|27 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Joel Bigna|
|28 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Danielle Burke|
|30 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralph Möhler|
|22 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mufiza Kapadia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0423-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.