Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between systematic review characteristics and conclusions for women aged 50–69

From: Conclusions in systematic reviews of mammography for breast cancer screening and associations with review design and author characteristics

Characteristics

Number of conclusions

Proportion of favourable conclusions (%)

p value (chi-square test)

Corresponding author

 Non-clinical

11

3 (27%)

 

 Clinical

9

7 (78%)

 
   

p = 0.025; χ 2 = 5.05

Competing interests

 Declared none

10

2 (20%)

 

 No statement

6

4 (67%)

 

 Declared

4

4 (100%)

 
   

p = 0.016; χ 2 = 8.27

Type of evidence

 RCT only

5

1 (20%)

 

 RCT and non-RCT

8

4 (50%)

 

 Non-RCT only

6

4 (67%)

 

 Cost-effectiveness

1

1 (100%)

 
   

p = 0.325; χ 2 = 3.47

Outcome measures

 Did not include harms

9

6 (67%)

 

 Included harms or over-diagnosis

11

4 (36%)

 
   

p = 0.178; χ 2 = 1.81

Meta-analysis

 Yes

7

2 (29%)

 

 No

13

8 (62%)

 
   

p = 0.160; χ 2 = 1.98

  1. Equivalent conclusions and characteristics for reviews separately considering age groups 50–59 and 60–69 were combined
  2. RCT randomised controlled trial