Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist review protocol
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoff Wong|
|26 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Coulter|
|27 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - France Legare|
|28 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Catherine Saunders|
|28 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gary Groot|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Gary Groot|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13643-017-0508-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.