Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of studies included in the review

From: A systematic review of neonatal treatment intensity scores and their potential application in low-resource setting hospitals for predicting mortality, morbidity and estimating resource use

Study

Study dates

Objective*

Setting

Sample size

In-hospital mortality||

Georgieff, 1989 [40]

1987

Validation

(TISS)‡

1 NICU†, USA

55

0

Gray, 1992 [19]

1989–1990

Development

(NTISS)§

3 NICUs†, USA

1768

114

Davies, 1995 [33]

Not reported

Validation

(NTISS)§

1 NICU†, South Africa

50

8

Eriksson, 2002 [34]

1991–1995

Validation

(NTISS)§

2 NICUs†, Sweden

240

39

Zupancic, 2002 [35]

1998 & 1999

Validation

(NTISS)§

1 NICU†, USA

154

Not reported

Mendes, 2006 [35]

2004

Validation

(NTISS)§

2 NICUs†, Brazil

96

9

Rojas, 2011 [37]

2007

Validation

(NTISS)§

1 NICU†,

1 intermediate unit, Colombia

22

Not reported

Oygur, 2012 [38]

2006–2010

Validation

(NTISS)§

1 NICU†, Turkey

364

103

Shah, 2015 [32]

2010–2012

Development

(unnamed)

23 NICU†s, Canada

9978

650

Wu,2015 [39]

2007–2011

Validation

(NTISS)§

1 NICU†, Taiwan

172

18

  1. *Study objective, model development (creation of a new model) or validation (application of an existing score/model to an external population)
  2. †Neonatal intensive care unit
  3. ‡Therapeutic intervention scoring system
  4. §Neonatal therapeutic intervention scoring system
  5. ||Primary outcome for the review. Data was however extracted on all outcomes reported by the authors