Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam G. Dunn
31 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Cates
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniele Mandrioli
14 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Dawid Pieper
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Dawid Pieper
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
24 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s13643-018-0722-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement