Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adam G. Dunn|
|31 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Cates|
|9 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniele Mandrioli|
|14 Dec 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dawid Pieper|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Dec 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Dawid Pieper|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2018||Editorially accepted|
|24 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0722-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.