Does information from ClinicalTrials.gov increase transparency and reduce bias? Results from a five-report case series
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rabia Bashir|
|18 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnes Dechartres|
|1 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Gaelen Adam|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Gaelen Adam|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Mar 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Apr 2018||Editorially accepted|
|16 Apr 2018||Article published||10.1186/s13643-018-0726-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.