Skip to main content

Table 4 Quality rating of the included studies according to Effective Public Health Practice Project’s Qualitative Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies

From: Evidence of past dental visits and incidence of head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference

Overall quality assessment

Selection bias

Study design

Confounders

Blinding

Data collection

Withdrawals and drop outs

Chen et al. [44]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

1

Mazul et al. [34]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Hashim et al. [20]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Laprise et al. [45]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

1

Friemel et al. [21]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Dholam and Chouksey [46]

Strong

1

2

2

2

1

2

Bertl et al. [31]

Moderate

2

3

2

2

2

2

Huang J et al. [47]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Tsai et al. [48]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Ahrens et al. [22]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Narayan et al. [49]

Weak

3

3

3

2

1

3

Moergal et al. [23]

Moderate

3

2

2

2

1

2

Eliot et al. [35]

Strong

1

2

1

1

1

2

Chang et al. [50]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Langevin et al. [4]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Frydrych et al. [53]

Moderate

3

2

2

2

2

2

Groome et al. [3]

Strong

2

1

1

2

2

2

Macfarlane et al. [24]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Johnson et al. [36]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Divaris et al. [18]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Watson et al. [1]

Moderate

3

2

2

2

2

2

Marques et al. [39]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Guha et al. [40]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Rosenquist et al. [56]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Guneri et al. [26]

Moderate

1

2

2

2

1

2

Lissowska et al. [27]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Gellrich et al. [32]

Weak

1

3

1

3

1

1

Balram et al. [52]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Garrote et al. [41]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

1

Winn et al. [42]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Moreno-Lopez et al. [54]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

2

Talamini et al. [28]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Bundgaard et al. [29]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

1

Lockhart et al. [38]

Weak

3

3

2

2

2

2

Maier et al. [30]

Moderate

3

2

2

2

1

2

Marshall et al. [37]

Moderate

3

2

1

2

1

2

Zheng et al. [51]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

1

Franco et al. [43]

Strong

1

2

1

2

1

2

Elwood et al. [2]

Strong

2

2

1

2

1

1