Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies

Systematic Reviews volume 9, Article number: 45 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Self-care behaviors in people living with type 2 diabetes are important to achieving optimal glycemic control. Major depression in type 2 diabetes is associated with decreased adherence to self-care behaviors. The association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors, however, has not previously been systematically reviewed. The objective of this review is to determine the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in five electronic databases that included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Emcare, and CINAHL. Any observational studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, investigating the association between subthreshold depression and any self-care behaviors, were included in the review. Qualitative studies, review articles, and gray literature were excluded. Two reviewers independently completed the title and abstract and full-text screening, appraised the study quality, and extracted the data. A third reviewer resolved any discrepancies between the reviewers if needed. Included articles were critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist. Meta-analyses were not conducted because criteria for conducting such analyses were not met.

Results

A total of 6408 articles were identified through the database searching. After the abstract and full-text review, two articles met the inclusion criteria. One of the included study was cross-sectional while the other was a longitudinal study. Both studies showed inconsistent findings in the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors. Important risks of bias were identified in the included studies.

Discussion

The evidence from the two included studies on a possible association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes was not consistent and potentially biased. Our review established a gap in knowledge and suggests that further high-quality studies are needed to examine the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with type 2 diabetes.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42018116373

Peer Review reports

Background

The global prevalence of diabetes is rapidly escalating as a result of several factors including urbanization, economic development, population aging, unhealthy eating habits, and sedentary lifestyles [1]. Over the past two decades, the number of people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) worldwide has more than doubled [2]. International Diabetes Federation estimated that 1 in 11 adults aged 20–79 years (463 million) were living with T2D in 2019, and by 2045, this number is projected to rise to 700 million [3].

Type 2 diabetes, like other chronic diseases, is associated with an increased risk of comorbid health problems, including depression. Authors of a meta-analysis based on 248 studies and 83,020,812 participants reported that 28% of adults with T2D had a co-occurring depressive disorder [4]. People with T2D are twice as likely to develop depression, compared with the general population [5,6,7]. Comorbid depression in people with T2D is generally associated with poorer health outcomes including sub-optimal glycemic control [8,9,10], higher rates of diabetes-related complications [11, 12], poorer quality of life [13, 14], and increased risk of mortality [15, 16]. There is also evidence of an association between T2D, depression, and higher health care costs [17].

The association between subthreshold depression and T2D has not been extensively studied. Subthreshold depression occurs when an individual experiences depressive symptoms that do not meet the diagnostic threshold for a major depressive disorder (MDD) with respect to frequency, severity, and/or duration of symptoms [18, 19]. Common in adults, a systematic review of 19 studies estimated the prevalence of subthreshold depression between 3 and 10% in clinical and between 1 and 17% in community settings [19].

In some studies of people with T2D, the prevalence of subthreshold depression has been reported to be more common than MDD [20,21,22]. Like major depression, subthreshold depression is also associated with a higher rate of diabetes-related complications [11, 13], disability [11], and mortality [11, 23, 24]. There is some indicative evidence that subthreshold depression may be associated with an increase in HbA1c [25]. Further, subthreshold depression is associated with an increased risk of developing MDD. For example, a meta-analysis of 16 longitudinal cohort studies involving 67,318 participants identified that people with subthreshold depression were twice as likely than non-depressed people to develop MDD [26].

Effective management of diabetes requires adherence to self-care behaviors. In diabetes, self-care behaviors include monitoring diet, engaging in physical activity, routinely checking blood sugar levels, medication adherence, and active foot care [27]. Good adherence with self-care behaviors has shown to be associated with improved glycemic control [28,29,30,31], fewer diabetes-related complications [32], a decrease in the use of health services [33], and an improvement in quality of life [34].

People with T2D and MDD often demonstrate poor diabetes self-care behaviors. A meta-analysis by Gonzalez et al. that included 47 studies and 17,319 participants found a significant relationship between depression and non-adherence to self-care behaviors [35]. A systematic review of 27 studies and 7266 people with T2D observed that depression was associated with low adherence to diet and physical activity [36]. There may be an association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with T2D. Our scoping searches of the literature did not identify any systematic reviews on this research topic. This systematic review aims to examine the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in adults with T2D.

Methods

This systematic review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [37] (Additional file 1). The review was prospectively registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 28th November 2018 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, registration number: CRD42018116373). A detailed summary of the review methods has been reported in our published protocol [38].

Eligibility criteria

The review included studies that (i) were conducted in adults aged 18 years or over and diagnosed with T2D, (ii) were any observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort), (iii) examined the association between subthreshold depression and any diabetes self-care behaviors, and (iv) were published in English. Studies were excluded if they were qualitative studies, review articles, and non-peer reviewed (gray) literature.

The self-care behaviors that were considered in the study were healthy eating, being physically active, monitoring of blood glucose, taking medication, not smoking, and foot care [27]. Currently, there is no agreed definition of subthreshold depression. Different terms—e.g., minor, subthreshold—are used to describe people with subthreshold depression [19]. For the purposes of our review, we defined subthreshold depression as minor, subthreshold, subclinical, subsyndromal depression, or a mood disorder that does not meet the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder [39].

Data source and search strategy

The search strategy was developed in consultation with a medical librarian experienced in systematic review database searching. We conducted a systematic search of the literature in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Emcare, and CINAHL. Databases were searched using a combination of medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords relating to “type 2 diabetes”, “depression”, and “self-care”. Boolean operators (“AND” and “OR”), proximity operators (“ADJ” and “N”), and truncation were incorporated into the search strategy as required to cater for the different use of terms. Search results were limited to English. Additional file 2 shows the Medline (ovid) search strategy used for this systematic review.

Study selection

All the references identified were imported into Endnote X9 [40], a reference manager software program. Following the removal of duplicates in Endnote, citations were imported into Covidence systematic review software [41]. All studies were then assessed for eligibility in Covidence using a two-step process, (1) title and abstract screening and (2) screening of full texts. Two authors, MS and FA, applied the predetermined eligibility criteria to all the articles by screening titles and abstracts independently. All disagreements concerning inclusion or exclusion of papers were judged by a third author (AG). Full-text reading of the articles was again done independently by two authors (MS and FA). The final decision on the inclusion of the full-text articles was made after a discussion with the review team members.

Data extraction

Two authors (MS and RG) independently extracted data from each of the included studies using the data extraction tool. A third author compared the authors’ data and resolved inconsistencies by referring to the full-text article and thorough discussion. The following data were extracted: citation, country of study, aim of the study, population characteristics (age, gender), study design (cross-sectional, case-control, or cohort) and setting (community or hospital), sample size, sample size calculation, sampling technique, data source (survey or secondary data), definition of subthreshold depression, measure used to examine subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors, analysis, confounder variables adjusted, and key observation of the study. There was no need to contact the authors of any studies for the study information.

Quality appraisal

All the included studies were assessed for methodological rigor using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist tool [42]. The JBI has separate checklists for cross-sectional (8 criteria), case-control (10 criteria), and cohort studies (11 criteria). Each component of the checklist was rated as yes, no, unclear, or not applicable. Two authors (MS and RG) independently evaluated the quality of each study, and disagreements were resolved by discussion within the review team.

Data analysis

Due to a smaller number of studies and variability in the outcome measures, results could not be combined by meta-analysis. A narrative synthesis of the study was conducted. Tables and narrative summaries are used to present the study and participant characteristics and findings of the studies.

Results

Search results

The details of the study selection process and search results are shown in Fig. .1. We identified a total of 6408 articles based on the systematic literature search in 5 databases: MEDLINE (n = 1147), EMBASE (n = 2955), PsycINFO (n = 447), Emcare (n = 1090), and CINAHL (n = 769). After removal of duplicates, the title and abstracts of 3674 articles were screened. Forty-seven studies were selected for a full-text review. Articles were excluded, generally, because study authors did not report on the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors (refer to Additional file 3 for the excluded studies). Two studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in the review.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow chart showing the study selection process and search results

Full size image

Study characteristics

Both the included studies were hospital based. A longitudinal study of 866 primary care attenders in Germany was reported by Dirmaier et al. [43], and Shin et al. reported a cross-sectional survey of 103 outpatients in the USA [44]. Table 1 shows selected characteristics of the two included studies.

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
Full size table

How was subthreshold depression determined?

The exposure, subthreshold depression, was determined using different procedures in the included studies. Dirmaier et al. classified participants as having subthreshold depression or depression if they had a Depression Screening Questionnaire (DSQ) score of between 5 and 7 or 8 or higher, respectively [43]. Shin et al. used a two-step process to make a depression diagnosis [44]. Initially, a screening questionnaire, the two-item version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) [45], was completed and scored. Participants with a score of 3 or higher were assessed by a clinician using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) Axis I Disorders, non-patient edition [46]. Also, participants taking any antidepressant medication (for any reason) and those who already had a MDD diagnosis were interviewed by a researcher. Participants were determined to have minor or major depression if they met DSM-IV diagnostic criteria [47].

How were self-care behaviors determined?

In the Dirmaier et al. study, six items in the questionnaire were used to determine self-care behaviors [43]: A single item was used to determine medication non-adherence and five items to determine non-adherence to other health behaviors (diet (2 items), smoking, alcohol, and physical activity). Shin et al. [44] used the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) [48] to determine participants’ level of self-care behaviors during the past 7 days. Self-care behaviors were assessed across five domains, which included diet, exercise, foot care, blood glucose testing, and medication taking. The overall self-care behavior was calculated by adding up the scores of all the domains.

Participant characteristics

Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. Included studies involved 968 adults (aged 18 years and above) participants. In both studies, males and females were equally represented [43, 44]. Participants in the Dirmaier et al. study [43] were older than those in Shin et al. study [44]. Mean diabetes duration was around 10 years in both studies [43, 44].

Quality appraisal

Quality appraisal of included studies is shown in Table 2. Since none of the included studies were of a case-control study design, the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist tool for cross-sectional and cohort studies was used. None of the studies was excluded based on their quality appraisal.

Table 2 Quality appraisal of included studies
Full size table

In the study by Dirmaier et al., 3 of 11 items were rated as potential sources of bias [43]. Of particular concern, key variables were determined using measures that were developed specifically for the study—e.g., medication non-adherence—despite validated measures being available. The flow of participants through the study is not clear and that authors do not state strategies to address the incomplete follow-up.

Several potentially important sources of bias were identified in the Shin et al. study [44]. Six items were rated low and two unclear risk of bias. The most important source of potential bias was related to confounding, as authors adjusted for three confounders (age, sex, and diabetes duration) in their analysis. Other potential confounders that may have impacted the observed association have not been addressed. The information about the setting of the study is not sufficiently detailed. Although the authors articulated clear hypotheses, the authors did not report a sample size calculation; consequently, it cannot be determined if the sample size was appropriate to test the expressed hypotheses.

Both the studies have used self-report tools to measure self-care behaviors [43, 44]. The study by Dirmaier et al. used a single item to measure medication adherence [43]. Health behavior was measured using a tool that was not validated, and the items specific to diabetes self-care behavior such as blood glucose testing and foot care were not included to measure total health behavior [43].

Based on these assessments, the overall methodological quality of included studies was judged to be potentially biased because of a number of reasons that included limitation in the research design, lack of use of validated measure, inappropriate confounder adjustments, and a small sample size.

Association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors

Dirmaier et al. reported that subthreshold depression was associated with non-adherence to health behavior over a period of 12 months follow-up [43]. The association was retained (β = 1.01, CI 0.62–1.40, p < 0.001) after adjusting for gender, age, marital and employment status, education, physical activity, BMI, smoking, drinking, duration of diabetes, and type of diabetes treatment. No significant association between subthreshold depression and medication non-adherence was observed.

Shin et al. reported that individuals with T2D and subthreshold depression scored lower in their self-care behavior as compared with the group without depression [44]. However, there was no significant association between subthreshold depression and overall self-care behavior or individual self-care domains (diet, exercise, blood sugar, foot care, and medication).

Discussion

This is the first review to systematically appraise and synthesize studies examining the association between subthreshold depression and diabetes self-care behaviors in adults with T2D. Our review included 2 studies involving 968 participants. Important potential sources of bias were identified in both included studies. One study showed a significant and the other a non-significant association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors. Based on these findings and the various quality issues identified in both studies, we concluded that the evidence on the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with T2D was inconsistent and potentially biased.

In people with T2D and MDD, there is clear evidence of an association with adherence to self-care behaviors. It is perhaps surprising that so few studies have tested this association in patients with T2D and subthreshold depression. Subthreshold depression is prevalent in T2D, affecting around 12% of patients [22]. Examining the association between subthreshold depression and self-care is perhaps an important area for further inquiry. Policymakers and researchers should prioritize further observational and experimental research in this area. If subthreshold depression is associated with decreased adherence to self-care behaviors, then this finding could become an important item for guidelines on the treatment and management of subthreshold depression in people with T2D. Effective management of subthreshold depression in people with T2D could prevent them from progressing into major depression.

This review has several limitations that need consideration. The review considered six domains of diabetes self-care behaviors that are often recommended for people with T2D: diet, physical activity, blood glucose monitoring, medication, foot care, and smoking. Other self-care behaviors, such as attending a diabetes education program and those recommended by the American Association of Diabetes Educators such as problem-solving, were not considered in this review [27]. A further limitation was the exclusion of the non-peer reviewed literature. We may have missed some of the important data by not having included gray literature in our review. However, as the validity of gray literature is difficult to be determined, this exclusion may be of less importance. We limited our search to the English language. It may be possible that studies published in other languages might have provided additional data, especially in a case such as ours, where the evidence is limited.

The included studies also have their own limitations that have been acknowledged by the authors. Both the studies are hospital based. Hence, the findings cannot be generalized to the community population with T2D. Similarly, the use of self-report tool in the studies may have overestimated the true adherence level as a result of social desirability bias and might have affected the result of the study. The findings from the study by Dirmaier et al. should be interpreted with caution as the study does not use a validated tool to measure self-care behaviors.

Conclusions

This review identified two studies that examined the association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with T2D. The evidence on this association was found to be inconsistent and potentially biased. High-quality research studies are necessary to further explore this association which may subsequently help in planning interventions to improve self-management of people with T2D.

Availability of data and materials

All the data supporting the conclusion of this review is included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

DSM-IV:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV

DSQ:

Depression Screening Questionnaire

JBI:

The Joanna Briggs Institute

MDD:

Major depressive disorder

PHQ:

Patient Health Questionnaire

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews

SDSCA:

Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities

T2D:

Type 2 diabetes

References

  1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmet PZ, Magliano DJ, Herman WH, Shaw JE. Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(1):56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 9th ed; 2019. Available from: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2017-atlas.html.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khaledi M, Haghighatdoost F, Feizi A, Aminorroaya A. The prevalence of comorbid depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on huge number of observational studies. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(6):631–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ali S, Stone MA, Peters JL, Davies MJ, Khunti K. The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2006;23(11):1165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(6):1069–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(Suppl):S8–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, de Groot M, Carney RM, Clouse RE. Depression and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):934–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson LK, Egede LE, Mueller M, Echols CL, Gebregziabher M. Longitudinal effects of depression on glycemic control in veterans with type 2 diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30(6):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Ting RZ, Yang W, Jia W, Li W, Ji L, et al. Depression in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: associations with hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and poor treatment adherence: 中国人 2 型糖尿病抑郁情况及其与高血糖, 低血糖及治疗依从性关系的研究. J Diabetes. 2015;7(6):800–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Black SA, Markides KS, Ray LA. Depression predicts increased incidence of adverse health outcomes in older Mexican Americans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(10):2822–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Groot M, Anderson R, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. Association of depression and diabetes complications: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2001;63(4):619–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Egede LE, Ellis C. The effects of depression on metabolic control and quality of life in indigent patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(4):257–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldney RD, Phillips PJ, Fisher LJ, Wilson DH. Diabetes, depression, and quality of life: a population study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1066–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katon WJ, Rutter C, Simon G, Lin EH, Ludman E, Ciechanowski P, et al. The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2668–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Xuanping Z, Norris SL, Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Beckles G, Kahn HS. Depressive symptoms and mortality among persons with and without diabetes. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(7):652–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Egede LE, Zheng D, Simpson K. Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Depression: the treatment and management of depression in adults (updated edition). Leicester: British Psychological Society; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodríguez MR, Nuevo R, Chatterji S, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Definitions and factors associated with subthreshold depressive conditions: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12(1):181.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmitz N, Gariepy G, Smith KJ, Clyde M, Malla A, Boyer R, et al. Recurrent subthreshold depression in type 2 diabetes: an important risk factor for poor health outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(4):970–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Albertorio-Diaz JR, Eberhardt MS, Oquendo M, Mesa-Frias M, He Y, Jonas B, et al. Depressive states among adults with diabetes: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007–2012. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;127:80–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang D, Shi L, Li L, Guo X, Li Y, Xu Y, et al. Subthreshold depression among diabetes patients in Beijing: cross-sectional associations among sociodemographic, clinical, and behavior factors. J Affect Disord. 2018;237:80–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman SM, Katon W, Lin E, Von Korff M. Depression and death in diabetes; 10-year follow-up of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a diabetic cohort. Psychosomatics. 2013;54(5):428–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin EH, Heckbert SR, Rutter CM, Katon WJ, Ciechanowski P, Ludman EJ, et al. Depression and increased mortality in diabetes: unexpected causes of death. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(5):414–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Heckbert SR, Rutter CM, Oliver M, Williams LH, Ciechanowski P, Lin EH, et al. Depression in relation to long-term control of glycemia, blood pressure, and lipids in patients with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):524–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee Y, Stockings E, Harris M, Doi S, Page I, Davidson S, et al. The risk of developing major depression among individuals with subthreshold depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Psychol Med. 2018;1:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  27. American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE guidelines for the practice of diabetes self-management education and training (DSME/T). Diab Educ. 2009;35(3_suppl):85S–107S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Houle J, Beaulieu MD, Chiasson JL, Lesperance F, Cote J, Strychar I, et al. Glycaemic control and self-management behaviours in type 2 diabetes: results from a 1-year longitudinal cohort study. Diabet Med. 2015;32(9):1247–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aikens J, Piette J. Longitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30(3):338–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Rattanasookchit S. Meta-analysis of the benefits of self-monitoring of blood glucose on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients: an update. Diab Technol Ther. 2009;11(12):775–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tshiananga JK, Kocher S, Weber C, Erny-Albrecht K, Berndt K, Neeser K. The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(1):108–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ausili D, Rossi E, Rebora P, Luciani M, Tonoli L, Ballerini E, et al. Socio-demographic and clinical determinants of self-care in adults with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre observational study. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(7):691–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adepoju OE, Bolin JN, Phillips CD, Zhao HW, Ohsfeldt RL, McMaughan DK, et al. Effects of diabetes self-management programs on time-to-hospitalization among patients with type 2 diabetes: a survival analysis model. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95(1):111–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Heinrich E, Schaper NC, de Vries NK. Self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Eur Diabetes Nurs. 2010;7(2):71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, Collins EM, Serpa L, Mimiaga MJ, et al. Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2398–403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sumlin LL, Garcia TJ, Brown SA, Winter MA, Garcia AA, Brown A, et al. Depression and adherence to lifestyle changes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(6):731–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shrestha M, Al-Ghareeb A, Alenazi F, Gray R. Association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviour in people with type 2 diabetes: a protocol for systematic review of observational studies. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sadek N, Bona J. Subsyndromal symptomatic depression: a new concept. Depress Anxiety. 2000;12(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Endnote [Computer program]. Version X9. Philadelphia: Clarivate Analytics. [Available from: https://www.endnote.com/].

  41. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software Melbourne, Australia. [Available from: https://www.covidence.org/home/].

  42. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dirmaier J, Watzke B, Koch U, Schulz H, Lehnert H, Pieper L, et al. Diabetes in primary care: prospective associations between depression, nonadherence and glycemic control. Psychother Psychosom. 2010;79(3):172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shin N, Hill-Briggs F, Langan S, Payne JL, Lyketsos C, Golden SH. The association of minor and major depression with health problem-solving and diabetes self-care activities in a clinic-based population of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complicat. 2017;31(5):880–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003;1:1284–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. First MB, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). Pers Assess. 2000;2000:49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  47. First M, Gibbon M, Spitzer R, Williams J. User’s guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders-research version-(SCID-I for DSM-IV-TR, November 2002 revision). New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a La Trobe University Postgraduate Research Scholarship (LTUPRS) and La Trobe University Full Fee Research Scholarship (LTUFFRS).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Monika Shrestha, Fatimah Alenazi & Richard Gray

  2. Global Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies (GIIS), Kathmandu, Nepal

    Monika Shrestha

  3. Department of Dietetics, Human Nutrition and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Ashley Ng

  4. Melbourne, Australia

    Amal Al-Ghareeb

  5. University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Richard Gray

  6. University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK

    Richard Gray

Authors
  1. Monika Shrestha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ashley Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amal Al-Ghareeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fatimah Alenazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS and RG jointly conceived and designed the study. MS developed the search strategies, and it was verified by RG and AAG. MS and RG extracted the data and appraised the quality of the included studies. AAG and FA resolved any disagreements. MS developed the first draft of the protocol, and RG, AAG, FA, and AN contributed to the revisions of the protocol. All the authors provided critical comments for revision and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Shrestha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shrestha, M., Ng, A., Al-Ghareeb, A. et al. Association between subthreshold depression and self-care behaviors in people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Syst Rev 9, 45 (2020). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13643-020-01302-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13643-020-01302-z

Keywords

Systematic Reviews

ISSN: 2046-4053