Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of included systematic reviews

From: Successful incorporation of single reviewer assessments during systematic review screening: development and validation of sensitivity and work-saved of an algorithm that considers exclusion criteria and count

 

Derivation set

Validation set

Systematic reviews, N (%)

10 (42%)

14 (58%)

Type of review, N (%)

 Systematic review without meta-analysis

7 (70%)

7 (50%)

 Systematic review with meta-analysis

2 (20%)

5 (36%)

 Scoping review

1 (10%)

2 (14%)

 Living review

0 (0%)

4 (29%)

Focus

 Therapeutic

3 (30%)

8 (57%)

 Diagnosis

3 (30%)

2 (14%)

 Prognosis

1 (10%)

1 (7%)

 Other

3 (30%)

3 (21%)

Screening, median (range)

 Abstract screened

484 (257 - 2469)

745.5 (232–9648)

 Full-text screened

110 (15 - 441)

150 (16–453)

 Eligible citations

27 (9 - 68)

21 (2–159)

 Reviewers

3 (2 - 6)

5 (2–13)

 Kappa

0.47 (0.25 - 0.76)

0.56 (0.37–0.9)

Field of study, N (%)

 Pediatrics

8 (80%)

9 (64%)

 Respirology

2 (20%)

1 (7%)

 Development

2 (20%)

0 (0%)

 Public Health

1 (10%)

5 (36%)

 Pathology

1 (10%)

3 (21%)

 Emergency

1 (10%)

1 (7%)

 Medical Education

1 (10%)

1 (7%)

 Surgery

1 (10%)

1 (7%)

 Neonatology

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 Nursing

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 Oncology

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 Psychiatry

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 Radiology

1 (10%)

0 (0%)

 Cardiology

0 (0%)

1 (7%)

 Critical care

0 (0%)

1 (7%)

  1. Type of review and field of study were not exclusive, as studies can cover multiple choices. Numbers add up to more than 100%