Skip to main content

Table 1 The required number of indirect comparison trials required to produce the same precision as a given number of direct (head-to-head) trials

From: Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis

Trial count ratio

Exact precision ratio

Number of indirect comparison trials required to match precision from the corresponding number of single trials in a pair wise meta-analysis

  

1

2

3

4

5

10

1:1

4

4 (2:2)

8 (4:4)

12 (6:6)

16 (8:8)

20 (10:10)

40 (20:20)

1:2

4.5

6 (2:4)

9 (3:6)

15 (5:10)

18 (6:12)

24 (8:16)

45 (15:30)

1:3

5.33

8 (2:6)

12 (3:9)

16 (4:12 )

24 (6:18)

28 (7:21)

56 (14:42)

1:4

6.25

10 (2:8)

15 (3:12)

20 (4:16)

25 (5:20)

35 (7:28)

65 (13:52)

1:5

7.2

12 (2:10)

18 (3:15)

24 (4:20)

30 (5:25)

36 (6:30)

72 (12:60)

1:6

8.17

14 (2:12)

21 (3:18)

28 (4:24)

35 (5:30)

42 (6:36)

84 (12:72)

1:7

9.14

16 (2:14)

24 (3:21)

32 (4:28)

40 (5:35)

48 (6:42)

96 (12:84)

1:8

10.13

18 (2:16)

27 (3:24)

36 (4:32)

45 (5:40)

54 (6:48)

108 (12:96)

1:9

11.11

20 (2:18)

30 (3:27)

40 (4:36)

50 (5:45)

60 (6:54)

120 (12:108)

1:10

12.1

22 (2:20)

33 (3:30)

44 (4:40)

55 (5:50)

66 (6:60)

121 (11:110)