Skip to main content

Table 1 Adverse effects terms in the bibliographic records in MEDLINE or Embase

From: Failure or success of search strategies to identify adverse effects of medical devices: a feasibility study using a systematic review

 

Relevant MEDLINE records retrieved (N=51)

Relevant Embase records retrieved (N=55)

Generic adverse effects terms

 Title

16% (8)

16% (9 plus 1 duplicate)

 Abstract

73% (37)

71% (39 plus 4 duplicates)

 Title or abstract

73% (37)

71% (39 plus 4 duplicates)

 Indexing

31% (16)

35% (19)

 Subheadings

51% (26)

62% (34)

 EMBASE section headings

NA

16% (9)

Any generic adverse effects terms

88% (45)

85% (47 plus 5 duplicates)

Specific adverse effects terms

 Title

18% (9)

20% (11 plus 1 duplicate)

 Abstract

61% (31)

67% (37 plus 4 duplicates)

 Title or abstract

61% (31)

67% (37 plus 4 duplicates)

 Indexing

37% (19)

73% (40 plus 3 duplicates)

Any specific adverse effects terms

69% (35)

82% (45 plus 5 duplicates)

Any adverse effects terms in any field

94% (48)

95% (52 plus 5 duplicates)