Skip to main content

Table 1 Extracted data included studies

From: Reliability of measurements of the fractured clavicle: a systematic review

Author

Number of patients

Goal of study

Modality

Measurements

Observers (role)/occasions

Statistics

Conclusion

Jones (2014) 18

30

Reliability

Shortening in mm

Displacement in %

Comminuted Y/N

Surgery Y/N

X-ray AP 30° caudo-cranial

Calibrated measuring tool

13 (13 surgeons)

2 (after 4 months)

Power analysis + intraobserver shortening 0.38

Interobserver shortening 0.33

K values stated

Strong inter- and intraobserver agreement for displacement and comminution

Weak to no interobserver and minimal intraobserver agreement for shortening

Silva (2013) 19

32

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability shortening in MSCF in adolescents (9–18)

X-ray 15° caudo-cranial AP

1. Observers’ method of choice

7 (3 pediatric orthopedic surgeons, 1 pediatric orthopedic fellow, 2 orthopedic residents, 1 medical student)

2 (1 week)

1. Interrater reliability 0.771 and 0.743

Intrarater reliability 2.62

Standardized method of measuring not better than method of choice

2. Standardized method

Digital measurement system

2. Interrater reliability 0.741 and 0.685

Intrarater reliability 3.34

Interrater no significant difference

Intrarater significant difference

Smekal (2008) 20

30

Assess different measuring methods and determine the most accurate method compared to CT

X-ray PA thorax

15° caudo-cranial AP of both clavicles

15° caudo-cranial AP clavicle CT

Standardized methods as described in article

4 (3 orthopedic surgeons, 1 radiologist)

2 (after 1 month)

Determination of differences of mean values: paired t test or nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Differences among measurements on X-ray and CT not significant

Repeatability coefficient on AP 15

Clavicle and clinical measurement low

Distribution from:

Kolmogorov-Smirnov test

Also smallest agreement with CT

Repeatability: RC according to Bland-Altman

A p < 0.05

PA thorax to determine length differences

Archer (2016) 21

22

Identify correlation between plain film and computed tomography (CT) measurement of displacement and the inter- and intraobserver reliability of repeated radiographic measurements

X-ray AP plain film CT

No standardized method of measurement

6 (3 orthopedic surgeons 3 residents)

Correlation using the Bland-Altman reliability coefficient

Limits of agreement using the standard deviation (SD): 3.48 reliability using the Cronbach α coefficient. 0.90

Intraobserver reliability using paired t tests for each observer: all but one > 0.05

Plain film measurements of acute MSCF do not reliably predict shortening