Skip to main content

Table 2 Study classification, identification and results availability in the HPV vaccine industry study programmes and non-industry funded clinical studies

From: Index of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine industry clinical study programmes and non-industry funded studies: a necessary basis to address reporting bias in a systematic review

Study classification, identification and results availability

Industry HPV vaccine studies

Non-industry funded HPV vaccine studies

P valueh

Total: N = 145

GSK (Cervarix): N = 69

Merck (Gardasil and Gardasil 9): N = 66

Otherg: N = 10

Total: N = 61

Cervarix: N = 6

Gardasil and Gardasil 9: N = 48

Other: N = 7

Study classificationa

 ‘Definitely exists’

127

(88%)

69

(100%)

50

(76%)

8

(80%)

33

(54%)

5

(83%)

28

(58%)

0

(0%)

< 0.0001

 ‘Probably exists’

18 (12%)

0 (0%)

16 (24%)

2 (20%)

28 (46%)

1 (17%)

20 (42%)

7 (100%)

< 0.0001

Study identification (ID)

 Uses study programme specificb ID

125 (86%)

66 (96%)

49 (74%)

10 (100%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

< 0.0001

 Uses manufacturer specificc ID

98 (68%)

68 (99%)

30 (45%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

< 0.0001

 Uses both study programme and manufacturer specific IDs

95 (66%)

65 (94%)

30 (45%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

< 0.0001

 Uses national clinical study (NCT) ID

132 (91%)

64 (93%)

58 (88%)

10 (100%)

44 (72%)

6 (100%)

33 (69%)

5 (71%)

0.0009

 Uses study programme, manufacturer specific and NCT IDs

91 (63%)

61 (88%)

30 (45%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

< 0.0001

 Uses additional or other ID(s)

42 (29%)

26 (38%)

16 (24%)

0 (0%)

51 (84%)

5 (83%)

40 (83%)

6 (86%)

< 0.0001

Study results availability

 Listed in a register or databased

138 (95%)

69 (100%)

59 (89%)

10 (100%)

57 (93%)

6 (100%)

45 (94%)

6 (86%)

0.73

 Listed on ClinicalTrials.gov

132 (90%)

64 (93%)

58 (88%)

10 (100%)

44 (72%)

6 (100%)

33 (69%)

5 (71%)

0.0009

 - Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov

65 of 132

(44%)

37 of 64

(58%)

28 of 58

(48%)

0 of 10

(0%)

6 of 44

(14%)

0 of 6 (0%)

6 of 33

(18%)

0 of 5

(0%)

0.0002

 - Results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for completed studies

65 of 110

(58%)

37 of 57

(65%)

28 of 49

(57%)

0 of 4

(0%)

6 of 37

(16%)

0 of 3

(0%)

6 of 29

(21%)

0 of 5

(0%)

< 0.0001

 Published in a biomedical journale

76 of 110

(69%)

42 of 57

(74%)

34 of 49

(69%)

0 of 4

(0%)

16 of 39

(41%)

3 of 3

(100%)

12 of 29

(41%)

1 of 7

(14%)

0.004

 Probably not published in a biomedical journale,f

34 of 110 (31%)

15 of 57 (26%)

15 of 49 (31%)

4 of 4 (100%)

23 of 39 (59%)

0 of 3 (0%)

17 of 29 (59%)

6 of 7 (86%)

0.004

  1. aFor “definitely exists” studies we demanded cross-verification of a studies existence from two or more sources. For ‘probably exists’ studies we demanded verification of a studies existence from one source
  2. bThe HPV vaccine manufacturers usually identified their HPV vaccine study programmes with specific identifiers, for example, “HPV-xxx” for Cervarix and “V50x-xxx” Gardasil and Gardasil 9
  3. cThe HPV vaccine manufacturers usually identified their HPV vaccine studies with manufacturer specific identifiers, for example, GlaxoSmithKline used a six-digit identifier (e.g., 104,896) and Merck Sharp & Dohme used a seven-digit identifier (e.g., 2004_081)
  4. dSee Additional file 1 for a complete list of the trial registers and databases that we searched
  5. e110 of the 145 industry studies and 39 of the 61 non-industry studies were completed and assessed for publication status
  6. f”Probably not published” studies were categorized as such if they were not identified as journal publications in the searches we performed (see Methods and Additional files 1 and 3)
  7. gOther HPV vaccine manufacturers were Shanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd. and Xiamen Innovax Biotech Co., Ltd
  8. hP values were calculated for total industry studies vs. total non-industry studies with Fisher’s exact test (http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm)