Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of included studies

From: The comparative efficacy and risk of harms of the intravenous and subcutaneous formulations of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: a rapid review

 

HannaH 2015

PrefHer 2017

MetaspHer 2017

 

Trastuzumab SC (n = 294)

Trastuzumab IV (n = 297)

n = 483

n = 113

Design

RCT

 

RCT, crossover

RCT, crossover

Follow-up

52–172 weeks

 

24 weeks

18 weeks

Age (years)

50 (25–81)

50 (24–77)

53 (27–83)

59 (35–85)

Body weight (kg)

68 (39–126)

66 (42–137)

66 (41–117)

70 (46–110)

Breast cancer subtype

   

Ductal

272 (92.8%)

273 (91.9%)

Not specified

70 (87.5%)

Lobular

12 (4.1%)

17 (5.7%)

 

3 (3.8%)

Other

9 (3.1%)

7 (2.4%)

 

6 (7.5%)

Ductal + other

0

0

 

1 (1.3%)

Estrogen receptor status

   

Negative

140 (47.6%)

148 (49.8%)

168 (34.8%)

43 (38.1%)

Positive

154 (52.4%)

148 (49.8%)

309 (64%)

57 (50.4%)

Unknown

0

1 (0.3%)

6 (1.2%)

13 (11.5%)

Nodal status

   

Negative

71a, b (24.2%)

62a (20.9 %)

229 (49.04%)c

Not specified

Positive

222a, b (75.8%)

235a (88 %)

227 (48.61%)c

 

Unknown

0

0

11 (2.36%)c

 

Tumor stage

   

T0

0

0

5 (1%)

Not specified

T1

19 (6.5%)d

23 (7.9%)d

204 (42.2%)

 

T2

129 (44%)d

130 (43.8%)d

208 (43.1%)

 

T3

52 (17.7%)d

49 (16.5%)d

37 (7.7%)

 

T4

93 (31.7%)d

95 (32%)d

25 (5.2%)

 

Unknown

0

0

4 (0.8%)

 
  1. aClinical nodal status, bn = 293, cn = 467, dclinical tumor stage