Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included individually randomized and cluster-randomized clinical trials

From: Self-determination theory interventions versus usual care in people with diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Author (year)

Clinicaltrials.gov ID

Design

Setting, country

Total (n)

Intervention

Control group

Participants

Type of diabetes

Mean age

Mean duration of diabetes (years)

Deliverer

Outcomes

Follow-up time points (months)

Brorson et al. (2019) [30]

A cluster-randomized controlled trial

Outpatient setting, Sweden

71

Guided self-determination (group based)

Standardized pump start education, follow-up after 1 week, follow-up after 4–6 weeks and 4 months after start

Adolescents (12–18 years)

Type 1

15.1 years (12–17.99)

NRa

“Guided self-determination youth group leaders (educational background not described)

Primary outcome: Hba1c

Secondary outcomes: DISABKIDS, check your health, the Diabetes Family Conflict scale (DFCS), the Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale (Swe-DES 23), usage of continuous glucose monitoring system. Multiple daily injections

6 and 12 months

Husted et al. (2014) [31]

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient setting, Denmark

71

Guided self-determination (revised for adolescents)

Eight sessions scheduled equal to the intervention group across an 8- to 12-month period, with a duration of 30 to 45 min. They received HbA1c measurement, advice on glycemic control, and insulin administration. Parents participated

Adolescents (13–18 years) HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol

Type 1

15 years

5.7 years

Two pediatric physicians, five pediatric diabetes nurses, and two dieticians (HCPs) provided the GSD-Y intervention

Perceived competence for diabetes management (PCD), Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ) assessing the degree to which patients believed their HCPs to be autonomy supportive versus Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) assessing the motivation for diabetes management and the degree to which behaviors tended to be self-determined. Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) assessing diabetes-related distress including a wide range of feelings related to living with diabetes and the Perception of Parents Scale (POPS)

Intervention group 215 ± 59 days versus control group 246 ± 83 days

Mohn et al. (2017) [32]

ClinicalTrials. gov NCT 01317459

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient setting, Norway

178 (62% women)

Guided self-determination (group based)

Usual care

Adults (> 18 years old), HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol

Type 1

18–55 years, mean age 36.7 ± 10.7

19 years, range (1–46)

Diabetes specialist nurses trained in the guided self-determination method

HbA1c

Self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), PAID; DDS, PCDS, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), WHO-5, HCCQ, TSRQ, treatment Relative Autonomy Index (RAI)

9 months

Zoffmann et al. (2006) [15]

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient setting, Denmark

50

Guided self-determination (group based)

Delayed group training

Adults (> 18 years old), HbA1c > 64 mmol/mol

Type 1

36.8 ± 1.7 (exp.)

35.7 ± 2.1 (cont.)

Age at onset of diabetes

18.2 ± 2 (exp.)

13 ± 2.2 (cont.)

Nurses trained in the guided self-determination method

Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ)

Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ)

Perceived Competence in Diabetes Scale (PCD)

Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID)

12 months

Zoffmann et al. (2015) [16, 33]

Trial registration: ISRCTN70566290

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient setting, Denmark

200, balanced 2:1

Guided self-determination (group based or individual)

18-month delayed GSD intervention

During the control period, participants received care as usual and met for sessions with nurse, doctor, or dieticians every 3–4 months

Adults (18 to 35 years old), HbA1c ≥ 64 mmol/mol

Type 1

25.7

13.7

Seven diabetes nurse specialists with 7–25 years of experience within the field of diabetes. They were GSD certified passing a test after 40 h of systematized training in the theoretical background and practical use of GSD, and all of them were supervised by V. Z.

Primary outcome: HbA1c

Secondary outcomes: PAID, WHO-5, Rosenberg SES, Perceived Competence in Diabetes (PCD, Treatment Self-regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), SMBG, Autonomy Index

HbA1c: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 months

Secondary outcomes 9 and 18 months

Juul et al. (2014) [34]

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01187069

A cluster-randomized trial

General practice, Denmark

4035 (56.5% men)

Self-determination theory (individual)

Usual practice at their general practitioner

NR

Type 1 (15% and type 2 85%)

60.4 ± 8.6 years

8 years

A total of 34 nurses from 19 of 20 intervention practices had received the core intervention. 22 nurses from the 13 practices had completed the full course

Primary outcomes: HbA1c, total cholesterol, PAID

18 months (average)

Mathiesen (2019) [35]

A randomized clinical feasibility trial

Outpatient clinic setting, Denmark

20

Guided self-determination (individual)

Usual care

Adults (> 18 years old), HbA1c > 53 mmol/mol

Type 2 diabetes

58 years (mean)

NR

The guided self-determination intervention was provided by the PhD student certified in the method

Primary outcomes: HbA1c, diabetes distress, depressive symptoms, physical activity, hip/waist ratio, eating habits

4-month follow-up

Nansel et al. (2015) [36]

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00999375

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient clinic setting, USA

136 (48.5% male)

Self-determination theory (Individual)

Received an equal amount of session and frequency of contacts with research staff and an equal frequency of 3-day masked CGM. Participants in the control group received no additional dietary advice beyond that provided as part of standard type 1 diabetes care. Scales, measuring cops, and spoons were provided to both groups

Adolescents 8–16.9 years old), HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, and ≤ 10%

Type 1

NR

6.0 years

Research assistants trained in pediatric T1 diabetes, intervention procedures, and motivational interviewing. Study investigators provided feedback to audiotaped role-play practice sessions prior to intervention delivery and on a random sample of audiotaped intervention sessions

Primary outcomes: diet quality, measured by the Healthy Eating Index 2005 (HEI2005), the whole plant food density (WPFD), measure and Hba1c

15 and 18 months

Vanroy et al. (2017) [23]

Clinical Trials.gov NCT 02064335

A randomized controlled pilot trial

Belgium

48

(27 men and 21 women)

Self-determination theory (individual)

Similar intervention 6 months delayed. The participants in the control group were told that during the waiting period, their health measurements were analyzed

 ≥ 18 years old

Type 2 diabetes

Experimental group: 65 ± 8

Control group: 59 ± 8

NR

An intake and an outtake session with a professional PA coach, who held the degree of Master in Physical Education and Movement Sciences and who was familiarized with SDT and motivational interviewing

Hba1c and measurement of physical activity (armband SenseWear). A minimum of 3 weekdays and 1 weekend day was considered a valid measurement week

1–5 months and 6 months

Glasgow et al. (2005) [24]

A randomized clinical trial

Outpatient clinic setting, USA

886

Self-determination theory (individual)

Participants completed a touch screen computer assessment procedure involving the Provider Recognition Program measures as well as a general health risk appraisal items (e.g., use of seatbelts, cancer screening, etc.). They had the same number of visits as intervention patients and received a printout but one that focused on general health tasks and risk reduction that did not address the DPP

 ≥ 25 years old

Type 2 diabetes

Intervention 62 ± 1.4

Control 64 ± 1.3

NR

NR

Primary outcomes: self-management goalsetting medical nutrition therapy, dilated eye examination, foot examination

Secondary outcomes: PAID 2, PHQ-9 depression scale, lipids and HbA1c, blood pressure, microalbuminuria

12 months

Yun et al. (2020) [37]

ChiCTR1900024354

A cluster-randomized controlled trial

General practitioner, China

364

Self-determination theory (group based or individual)

2 control group interventions

 1) Usual care group offering regular public health management services

 2) Social support group (SSG) providing 3-month social support intervention based on problem-solving principles

 ≥ 18 years old

Type 2 diabetes

65.14 ± 7.23 years old

NR

Community doctors

Primary outcome: HbA1c

3 and 6 months

  1. aNot reported