Skip to main content

Table 2 Critical appraisal result of the studies using quasi-experimental study design, 2022

From: The effectiveness of nurse-led interventions to manage frailty in community-dwelling older people: a systematic review

Included articles

Criterion No (items included to appraise quasi-experimental studies)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Raw %

Risk

Jiyeon Ha and Yeon-Hwan Park, 2020 [37]

*

88.9

Low

Song MS. and Boo S, 2022 [1]

*

*

77.8

Moderate

Varwijk M. et al. 2020 [36]

X

*

77.8

Moderate

  1. √ = yes, X = no, * = unclear, ¥ = not applicable
  2. Criterion No. 1: Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’? No. 2: Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? No. 3: Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? No. 4: Was there a control group? No. 5: Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure? No. 6: Was follow-up complete, and if not, was follow-up adequately reported? No. 7: Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? No. 8: Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? No 9: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?