Skip to main content

Table 4 AMSTAR 2 quality rating of included systematic reviews

From: Effects and mechanisms of Tai Chi on mild cognitive impairment and early-stage dementia: a scoping review

 

PICO research question

Protocol

Study design inclusion rationale

Comprehensive literature search

Duplicate study selection

Duplicate data extraction

List excluded studies + rationale

Adequate study characteristics

Satisfactory RoB Assessment

Funding source of studies

Appropriate meta-analysis

Study RoB impact on meta-analysis

Study RoB impact on conclusions

Heterogeneity explained, discussed

Publication bias assessed, discussed

Conflict of interest, funding declared

Author, year

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

Wang et al. (2018) [23]

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

N

Y

Y

N

Y

N

N

Y

Y

Y

Wei et al. (2020) [2]

Y

Y

N

PY

N

N

N

Y

Y

N

Y

N

Y

Y

N

Y

Yang et al. (2020) [4]

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

N

PY

PY

N

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Zou et al. (2019) [24]

Y

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

PY

N

N

N

N

Y

Y

N

Lim 2019

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

N

PY

PY

N

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Farhang 2019 [14]

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

Y

PY

PY

N

N

N

N

N

N

Y

Zheng 2017 [3]

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

N

PY

N

N

N

N

N

Y

N

N

Zhang et al. 2020 [16]

Y

N

N

PY

Y

Y

N

PY

Y

N

Y

N

N

Y

N

N

  1. Y yes, PY partial yes, N no. High quality yes, for all critical and non-critical items. Moderate quality yes, or partial yes for all applicable critical items and yes or partial yes, for more than 4 applicable non-critical items. Low quality yes, or partial yes for more than 4 applicable critical items; and yes or partial yes, for more than 4 applicable non-critical items. Critically low quality yes or partial yes, for 4 or less applicable critical or non-critical items. Critical items: 2, 4, 9, 11, 13, and 15. Non-critical items: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 14, and 16