From: Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review
 | Supporting evidence | |
---|---|---|
Context | Model of guiding principles integrated into all fractions of adolescent life (e.g. schools, policy, community, family) | Mechanism triggered (1) Icelandic Prevention Model [84] (2) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Chile [51] (3) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Lithuania [52] (4) Communities that Care Australia [63] (5) Fighting Back (2002) [23] (6) New Directions (2005) [20] (7) Project Freedom (Wichita) [74] Mechanism not triggered (1) Connect to Protect (C2P) Thailand [54] (2) Communities that Care UK [67] (3) Communities that Care Scottish Pilot [68] (4) Communities that Care Pennsylvania (2015) [55] (5) Communities that Care (CYDS) (2009) [59] (6) Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative (CPWI) (2020) [53] (7) TOGETHER CTC Oregon (1992) [69] (8) Kentucky Initiatives for Prevention (2007) [71] (9) Project Freedom Lawrence (2004) [72] (10) Red de Coaliciones Comunitarias de Mexico [79] (11) PROSPER (2007) [76] (12) The Gloucester Prevention Network (1997) [83] (13) Communities that Care (The Netherlands) [64] |
Mechanism | Empowerment, support and collaboration—being able to choose what works best for different areas of communities while also being able to stick to a set of principles. Working together across society on a set of principles leading to strong community collaboration. | |
Outcome | Positive risk and protective factor outcomes and health risk behaviour outcomes through creating an environment where all domains of the community are working towards health risk behaviour prevention. |