From: Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review
 | Evidence | |
---|---|---|
Context | Using population data to establish community readiness, make decisions and track progress | Mechanism triggered (1) Icelandic Prevention Model [22] (2) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Chile [51] (3) Icelandic Prevention Model delivered in Lithuania [52] (4) Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative (CPWI) [53] (5) Communities that Care Australia [63] (6) TOGETHER! Communities for Drug Free Youth [69] (7) New Directions (2005) [20] (8) Project Freedom (Wichita) [74] (9) Communities that Care (CYDS) (2009) [59] (10) Communities that Care Pennsylvania [55] (11) Communities that Care (The Netherlands) [64] Mechanism not triggered (1) Connect to Protect (C2P) Thailand [54] (2) Red de Coaliciones Comunitarias de Mexico (The Network of Community Coalitions in Mexico) [79] (3) Minority Youth Health Project [86] (4) Communities that Care (Scottish Pilot) [68] (5) Communities that Care (UK) [67] (6) Kentucky Initiatives for Prevention (2007) [71] (7) PRSOPER [76] (8) Minority Youth Health Project [80] (9) The Youth Community Coalition [82] (10) The Gloucester Prevention Network (1997) [83] |
Mechanism | Local knowledge of the community, flexibility to adapt to the data, motivation to continue by seeing the impacts and being involved in data analysis. | |
Outcome | Changes in the social environment leading to reductions in adolescent MRB. |